Quantcast

Anontalk = Child Porn image links & Pedophilia hangout

Sun, Nov 1, 2009

Featured

AnontalkPostdeleted

To anyone who will read this post, you have to get involved and help bring attention to the absolute filth of a website called Anontalk. This site must be closed down immediately. People are posting (what they think is anonymously) links to child porn. People are also posting stories and fantasies of sex with children. This website is a haven for pedophiles. I cannot believe that in today’s society we are allowing this to take place. Why does a website of this nature exist? I don’t understand.

To the site owner Kimmo Alm:

The only reason I would even name your site is because my readers come to my site for a specific purpose. I can’t imagine they would be the same type.

There is absolutely no reason on this earth that we should be allowing a website of this nature to exist. Kiddie porn is being posted, people are talking about having sex with children, etc. It’s truly the most reviling website I have have come across in a long time. You disgust me.

Encyclopedia Dramatica gives a GREAT break down on this individual who runs this website.

In the mean time, I will be preparing a few things. I am going to work on various emails, faxes, etc and will be reporting you to every agency in the world that will accept it. Please note that I will follow up with a post on how to report this website and him this week.

See the screenshot images below of anontalk below which provides evidence that this website allows the acts of child porn image linking as well as allowing child pedophiles to converse about their sick thoughts.

Popularity: 24%

Related

, , , , , , , , , , ,

64 Responses to “Anontalk = Child Porn image links & Pedophilia hangout”

  1. Pieceofmymindchick Says:

    How about you calm the fuck down that’s just thier preference! If you don’t take it up the pussy why is it so tabo to Texas neatfreaks like you that shreak when thiers child rape ? Is normal rape fine because japan can tolerate it ust fine because ITS THEIR GODDAM preference.what about doggystyle?it was never meant to go their but since horny people in America did it’s fine now?many because you tolerated it?theirs also beatiality/furry/limb fetishes/bdsm which your tolerating already/fatgirl porn/taking ashit porn(2girls1cup)/gay(which I will laugh once tolerating it will be finished)/flexible/self/so many more. And the biggest reason is that with somuch bland porn and with bland white people like you saying everything else is bad they will see it as taboo and forbidden and just make people crave it more so a child deciding he or she wants to post a picture or video that would make a dam pedophile jerk off instead of attemp and successfully rape for something this taboo

    [Reply]

  2. anon Says:

    yeah! freedom of speech is stupid! if anyone says anything we don’t want to hear, and therefore know that it’s better for everyone else if they don’t hear it, they yeah! shut those bastids up!

    everybody should think and talk and act exactly like me or die!

    (is that what you’re getting at? whiny.)

    [Reply]

  3. anon Says:

    shit where am i gonna get my CP nao?!?!?!

    [Reply]

  4. Adrian Upmeyer Says:

    I came by this page while searching Yahoo and just wanted to thank you for the nice blog post. It made me think about another site Hooponopono. I will have to add this site to my favorites so that I can return again! Thank you!

    [Reply]

  5. Margene Marsden Says:

    I must say that your own blogging site is completely insightful. I’ve been expending a ton of effort in the last couple months seeking at what precisely is available in accordance with the actual fact that I will be arranging to launch a blog site. The particulars you have put together here is pretty much to the point. It just is perceived as so difficult with reference to all the programming languages that are in existence, but I really like the way your feels. Gotta absolutely adore where technological innovation has come during the past 13 years.

    [Reply]

  6. Darling Says:

    I thought that it was just some crap made up to make the guy who owns the site look bad… i checked it out and apparently that is not the case. He’s got lots of perverts on that site… doing all the wrong things for all the wrong reasons. Not cool.

    [Reply]

  7. KING_LOUIS_16TH_OF_FRANCE Says:

    The author of this article needs to calm down a little. Most of the website is just satire and harmless in-joke nonsense.
    I wouldn’t worry about the “sysOP” or the users. Once again it seems your personal feelings and opinions have got the better of any rational thinking you have (had).

    Nothing you can do will stop anything. Anontalk going down will not stop anything. You think the people really into this stuff post on silly little websites like this? Shitty little http bbs’s.
    I don’t think so.

    [Reply]

    anon Reply:

    What the hell are you talking about? Throw away beautiful overreaction for controlled reason? You’re livin’ in America, dude, where the internet is srs bsns and free speech is worth less than goat shit. You think people are free to satirize whatever the hell they want? WELL, YOU THOUGHT RONG!!1

    [Reply]

    datGurl! Reply:

    U NEED TO CALM DOWN.. Regardless of the rhetoric, havin sex with children is wrong. There is no consensual sex between a grown ass man and a child!! “Children” are not at the age of consent at 6-14 (one the of age preferences on the site)

    There is nothing funny about ANYTHING I saw on that site.
    Wake up!
    (and learn how to spell- readin’ that hurt my eyes.

    [Reply]

  8. Deville Says:

    I am neither for or against Anonalk, it was funny when it started and was very much “tounge in cheek”. I don’t think it was ever ment to be taken seriously. The average age of anontalk users must have been 12-18, i don’t think that kids talking shit is anything to froth at the mouth about and go into an anti-frenzy. It shows a massive gap in our socity, the younger “internet” generation have their own humour and outlets for the sickness that prevails in our culture. Younger kids are being force fed the same media rubbish that you adults are fed, War, pedophillia, poverty and deasese and this is how they react. In essence the Anon generation are your shit and you should be ashamed of what you have eaten.

    [Reply]

  9. Manvich Says:

    When is somebody gonna take the bloody law into their own hands and break a glass bottle in Kimmo’s ass? Clearly the swedish government doesn’t care much and I’m sure the press has had multiple reports from people regarding him yet no stories have been made.

    If I ever see this sick fuck walk past me, I don’t think I could restrain myself. Call it internet tough talk if you will, but even if I’d loose the fight or end up paying a fine, I’d still punch his ugly mug the first chance I’d get.

    Also, we need a symbol for Chris Hansen that we can use whenever he needs to be called upon. Chris, the world needs your skills right about now!

    [Reply]

  10. Sysop Says:

    Everyone talks tough but Anontalk is still here. The best site in the work isn’t going to be taken offline by script kiddies. As long as sysop can make money (which he is) anontalk is unstoppable.

    [Reply]

    Anonymous Reply:

    Sysop you pedophile idiot,
    first of all dont talk in 3rd person, second shut up, third give upyour child pornography hosting website.

    [Reply]

    Anonymous Reply:

    Sysop you are an absolutely disgusting human being. Your website being brought down should not be the prime objective of the “script kiddies” the objective should be to get you arrested for running a site that allows pedophiles to display pornographic material of minors. I hope that you realize what you are doing before you are arrested as I am sure you will be if you continue to host and run anontalk. You seem to have developed a sort of god complex and you obviously are a very troubled individual. I urge you to seek professional psychiatric help immediately and to remove your site from the internet.

    [Reply]

    Anonymous Reply:

    Sysop your attack on 4chan is such a joke that no one is even bothering to talk about it, get a fucking life.

    [Reply]

    Anonymous Reply:

    sysop you are my hero

    [Reply]

  11. Mike Says:

    This is when The Amazing Chris Hansen comes in =]

    [Reply]

    Crimes & Justice Reply:

    I really wish he would take on this case.

    [Reply]

  12. /b/ Says:

    /b/ has attacked and taken the site down.

    [Reply]

    Crimes & Justice Reply:

    Thanks /b/ for informing me and my readers of this.

    [Reply]

    \d\ Reply:

    1 and 2…

    [Reply]

    Anon Reply:

    This is not a permanent solution. As soon as the attack is lifted the site will resurface. Something needs to be done about Kimmo himself in order to truly keep this site offline.

    [Reply]

    Savetheinternet Reply:

    PEQ sent me this response regarding to the situation:

    If you think it’s illegal, go to the police and file a complaint. We
    can’t do anything without a Swedish court order.
    We have still not received any evidence about this customer using his
    service from us to SPAM.

    [Reply]

    Crimes & Justice Reply:

    Yeah they dont care. I sent them a report and they closed it same day. Bull crap.

    Mike Reply:

    if you want me to, when the site comes back up I’ll flood it back down. The place where i work at barely blocks anything and I have an amazing flooder. So I can do it from home and work =D

    [Reply]

    Crimes & Justice Reply:

    Understood. It was interesting and great while it lasted. People were not able to gain access to child pornography. I have been reporting him and I just dont understand why the authorities do not care.

    [Reply]

    anonymous Reply:

    You know the rules and so do I

    [Reply]

  13. Gary Arctic Says:

    You should try to write some top list type articles or something like it

    [Reply]

  14. programming information Says:

    Really? Don’t get me wrong, I concur with you partially, but when you make a statement like this you really have to be prepared to defend it.

    [Reply]

  15. ho hum Says:

    Okay.. so, if sweden’s police isn’t interested, how about the press?
    nyhetstips@dn.se, 71000@aftonbladet.se, tips@expressen.se and 71555@svd.se for some swedish newspaper news tip email addresses..

    [Reply]

  16. Anon Says:

    I went there once and found a thread of some teen posting nudes of herself. Later in the thread, she revealed she was underage, but continued posting nude pictures.

    [Reply]

  17. Issac Maez Says:

    I’ve been reading a few posts and really and enjoy your writing. I’m just starting up my own blog and only hope that I can write as well and give the reader so much insight.

    [Reply]

  18. Crimes & Justice Says:

    So frustrating… I reported him to PRQ and they closed my ticket immediately. That’s ok. I will keep on reporting until someone takes interest in this snake of a website.

    [Reply]

  19. Concerned Parent Says:

    We need to take action ASAP!. I dont want my children to find that website.

    [Reply]

  20. The Informer Says:

    Anonymous B, however determined your Sysop Kimmo Alm may be, he is no more immune to international law than anyone else. Neither his, nor his server’s residency in Sweden serves him any legal protection, as shown by the Pirate Bay conviction. There is a wealth of collected evidence against him. It is only a matter of time.

    [Reply]

  21. Anonymous B Says:

    Take it from an AnonTalk veteran: AnonTalk can’t be shut down. Sysop is the most determined man in the world, and every post to AT is carefully monitored. Trolling and reporting is just a waste of your time. Have you gotten even one human reply to any of your reports? I bet not.

    [Reply]

    doviine Reply:

    dumb and dumber

    [Reply]

    Anon Reply:

    Hi there. Kimmo.

    How’s that $50,000 in web hosting debt treating you? You eaten yet this month?

    [Reply]

  22. loopzy Says:

    Thanks this was a good read

    [Reply]

  23. Nalr Says:

    Firstly, let’s start with the definition of pornography…

    por·nog·ra·phy (pôr-nŏg’rə-fē)
    n.
    Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.

    The presentation or production of this material.

    Next, let’s look at 18 U.S.C. § 2252A – Certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child pornography

    (A) reproduces any child pornography for distribution through
    the mails, or in interstate or foreign commerce by any means,
    including by computer; or
    (B) advertises, promotes, presents, distributes, or solicits
    through the mails, or in interstate or foreign commerce by any
    means, including by computer, any material or purported
    material in a manner that reflects the belief, or that is
    intended to cause another to believe, that the material or
    purported material is, or contains -
    (i) an obscene depiction of a minor engaging in
    sexually explicit conduct; or
    (ii) a depiction of an actual minor engaging in
    sexually explicit conduct;

    There’s your sources, now please, fuck off with your “Oh, me writing my fantasies is freedom of speech”. If your fantasies contain any sexual acts with people who may be perceived or are actually a minor, by the definition of US law (I’m assuming you’re in the US, but if not, then I’m sure that given a little time, I can find the correct section in any country’s legal framework), then you are guilty of de facto production of child pornography.

    Yes, there is no law that can censor thought, but when that thought is written down, or otherwise created in a permanent medium (under the assumption that any non-volatile medium is permanent, and verifiable), it then crosses into an area that can, and is legally enforceable.

    [Reply]

    doviine Reply:

    Fabulous post! These people are not all that smart.

    [Reply]

  24. porlaverdad3 Says:

    “Child pornography means *sexualizing* children.”

    No, child pornography means child pornography. It means sex or nudity.

    “Porlaverdad3 is trying ot justify his sick fantasies.”

    No, what I`m saying is that pedophiles have the right the express themselves just like any other person.

    “Pedophiles DO NOT have the right to express their fantasies as porlaverdad3 stated”

    Why not? It’s not illegal. It’s FREEDOM OF SPEECH. What do you prefer: harmless fantasies thad do not hurt anybody or actually raping children? FANTASIES DON’T HURT ANYBODY. And it’s completely legal.

    Can you link me, crimeandjustice, to a link where I can read the law that bans writing fantasies? Please, i would be glad to read it. Do you have the link? Which is the law that prohibits writing sexual fantasies? Do you know? Please, tell me.

    Pedophiles have the right to express their fantasies like any other human beings. There is no law that can censor thought. Do you want to live in a country that censor thought? Do you want to live in an orwellian society?

    “. That is what causes harm against our children and their families. ”

    No, what causes harm is RAPE, not FANTASIES! If not, do you have the cientifical study that says that fantasies hurt people?

    “Yes it is sick to me and the majority of the world.”

    What you and the rest of the world think is irrelevant. You and the rest of the world used to think 50 years ago that homosexuality was a sickness. Yes, you and the rest of the world can (and are) wrong, so that doesn’t prove anything.

    [Reply]

    doviine Reply:

    Keep blabbing…

    [Reply]

  25. porlaverdad3 Says:

    Also, pics of little girls is not CP. Do you know what CP is? It means sex with children, and none of those image contain sex or nudity. So it’s not CP.

    [Reply]

    Forthetruth Reply:

    Child pornography means *sexualizing* children. Nice strawman you got there, you are still a pedophile though.

    [Reply]

    Crimes & Justice Reply:

    Concurred!

    Porlaverdad3 is trying ot justify his sick fantasies. What is so sad is the word “dad” is in his user name.

    Pedophiles DO NOT have the right to express their fantasies as porlaverdad3 stated. That is what causes harm against our children and their families.

    Yes it is sick to me and the majority of the world.

    [Reply]

    doviine Reply:

    Yep

    ReDDs Reply:

    porlaverdad mean by the truth this is one of them sick short latin men that can deal with a women because they are the size of a leprechaun…… so they fantasize with babies it is the only way to feel big in some type of way cabron sucio maldigo la hora k hay enfermos como tu so eskreta

    doviine Reply:

    Pedophilia is a fetish, it is a perspective .. the pedophile sexualizes anything and everything… corrupts what is holy and good.

    As the pedophilia progresses it renders the mind shallow, 2 dimensional, then so flat, it is one-dimensional and utterly transparent. We can all see right through this guy… and he can’t see that.. he is in a dangerous position and so vulnerable he can’t deal with anything adult (as has already been said here).

    He is at a disadvantage… we would take him apart piece by piece.. his only hope is death and he knows it. I am a believer in God and his forgiveness… and I also know that even if the sinner is sincere in his desire for redemption, he still must sow what he has reaped. The thief who repented still died alongside the Master.

    [Reply]

  26. porlaverdad3 Says:

    Talking about having sex with children is not illegal. Posting CP is, thought.

    But you are confusing something illegal (posting CP) with something that is not (posting fantasies about sex with children). Posting fantasies is not illegal: is freedom of speech.

    Pedophiles also have the right to express themselves and their fantasies, as long as they don’t break any law. Laws that censor speech are unconstitutional.

    “as well as allowing child pedophiles to converse about their sick thoughts.”

    Sicks to who? To you? Just because you find them “sick” doesn’t mean you have the right to CENSOR what you find sick. As I said, pedophiles have the right to express themselves and their thoughts.

    You don’t have the right to control and monitor what other people say or think. Fantasies don’t hurt anybody. Posting fantasies about having sex with children does not hurt anybody, and in fact, is a great way of canalize the sexual desire.

    PEDOPHILES ALSO HAVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Fantasies don’t hurt anybody.

    [Reply]

    ReDDs Reply:

    FUCK YOU porlaverdad3 which means in spanish “by the truth” you are a sick bastard and i hope one day they find tied up gag and burned I HATE PEOPLE LIKE YOU SO MUCH GOD……..

    [Reply]

    doviine Reply:

    so, “bythetruth3″ ok, I thought the “dad” at the end was intentional… yes,this makes his words even more disturbing. These people thrive on the shock they imagine inducing in others. Alas, they are only an empty shell, they crumble so easily and only feel real when the elicit an emotional reaction in others. I pray for any and all children who have to cross his path, ever.

    [Reply]

    ReDDs Reply:

    I really hope this sick bastard and any fool that enjoys this have a special place down with lucifer and his creatures this is very disturbing but hey… every pig has they christmas!!!

    Rucifer Reply:

    >Laws that censor speech are unconstitutional.

    It’s Swedish, you asshole, and EU law states that explicit stories featuring children are Child Pornograhy.

    [Reply]

    J Reply:

    Actually, even in the United States not all speech is constitutionally protected. Commercial speech, “fighting words,” incitement of illegal activity and obscenity are all given significantly less protection under state and federal law. Obscenity in particular is not protected and is freely regulated by the states. Child pornography (and this term includes literary and “artistic” depictions), falling into the category of obscenity, is absolutely regulated and unprotected. Any half-decent class on constitutional law will point this out to all of the delusional pedophiles out there.

    [Reply]

  27. espenh Says:

    My father in-law made a joke that the baby better be a boy or not to bother telling him. I was so hurt! How do you even respond to comments like this?

    [Reply]

    doviine Reply:

    The only response is silence, no matter what.

    [Reply]

  28. emme Says:

    I am shocked, more than shocked, at the content of those pages! I knew sites like this existed somewhere on the internet, I just never expected the people to be so honest about their sickness. I hope these people die soon, somehow by the graces of God, so they can’t mess up anymore kids and turn them into pedophiles, too.

    [Reply]

  29. kimbo slice Says:

    Note of warning: there is malware on the site linked by “fgsfds.” Not that any readers *would* download anything off a child-porn-peddler’s website, but in case the thought crossed your mind — DON’T.

    Various folks have been trying to get this guy taken down for awhile now. We welcome any and all support.

    Thanks for posting this!

    [Reply]

  30. fgsfds Says:

    Yeah this guy needs to be stopped. If you read his writing, you can tell he is a seriously messed up dude. Here’s his personal website. He’s clearly suffering from OCD and Asperger’s.

    Http://www.kimmoa.se

    [Reply]

    Crimes & Justice Reply:

    All users please see the comment by Kimbo Slice. Be very careful anytime you click links that you are unsure of. As mentioned this website has been identified to hold malware and I will only keep the website there for information purposes only.

    [Reply]

  31. Finlandia Says:

    Yep. He is also a known email spammer.

    He lives a few yards from the Swedish equivalent of a elementary school. He lives at Lina Sandells, in plan 18 (located in Blottenvarganen, something like that) in Hagersten (stockholm area)

    He spams imageboards with Child porn, then reports them for it.
    Hypocroctcy much?

    (sorry for bad spelling, read my name)

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply